Blog

New Federal Proposal Would Take Away Hard-Fought Paid Sick Days Protections

| Nov 3, 2017

(Read time: )

This week, Rep. Mimi Walters (R-Calif.) introduced the deceptively named Workflex in the 21st Century Act – H.R. 4219 – in the U.S. House of Representatives. The bill is an obvious effort by the organized business lobby to reverse the paid sick days progress of recent years. Eight states and 32 localities now have, or will soon have, paid sick days laws in place thanks to the hard work of diverse coalitions of working people, advocates, business leaders and lawmakers. H.R. 4219 would severely undermine those protections by allowing companies to bypass the requirements if they voluntarily offer some paid time off and “substantially comply” with the requirements of the Walters proposal.

H.R. 4219 comes at a time when voters across the political spectrum say they want lawmakers to prioritize policies like paid family and medical leave and paid sick days. But H.R. 4219 does nothing to guarantee people dedicated time to address their personal and family health needs. Instead, it would allow companies to skirt hard-fought state and local paid sick days laws without guaranteeing their workers the right to the sick time they need when they need it, because employers will ultimately decide if, when and for what reasons people can use the time. The sham bill would create a dangerous new precedent that threatens public health, workers’ economic security and fairness for businesses.

The evidence clearly shows that paid sick days laws establish important baselines that reap widespread benefits for working people, businesses, communities, our economy and our public health. They guarantee people the right to earn paid time away from their jobs to recover from illness, care for a sick child or loved one and get preventive care. Most also allow workers to seek assistance and treatment related to domestic violence, sexual assault or stalking. In short, they help ensure that people are not forced to choose between their health or the health of a family member and a job.

At a time when more than 37 million people in the United States still do not have access to a single paid sick day, lawmakers need to be protecting and advancing paid sick days protections – not gutting them like H.R. 4219 would do. Specifically, we need a national paid sick days policy like the Healthy Families Act, which would ensure all workers – regardless of where they live or work or what job they hold – have the right to sick time. Members of Congress who are serious about providing workers with paid sick days will reject H.R. 4219 and instead prioritize the Healthy Families Act.

About the Author

Vicki Shabo

Vicki Shabo

Vicki Shabo is vice president at the National Partnership for Women & Families and is one of the nation's leading experts on paid family and medical leave, paid sick days and the workplace policy advocacy landscape. She previously served for more than four years as the organization's director of work and family programs. Shabo is responsible for the strategic direction of the National Partnership’s work to promote fair and family friendly workplaces and leads the organization’s work on paid family and medical leave, paid sick days, expansion and enforcement of the Family and Medical Leave Act, workplace flexibility, fair pay and pregnancy discrimination. She serves as a contact on workplace policy issues for key national allies, researchers, businesses and state and local advocates and has been quoted in the New York Times, Washington Post, Associated Press, USA Today, CNN and MSNBC, among other outlets.

Shabo brings a unique background in law and politics to her work: Prior to joining the National Partnership in 2010, she practiced law in the litigation department at WilmerHale, a large international law firm. Before embarking on a legal career, she worked with both Celinda Lake and Harrison Hickman, serving as a pollster and political strategist to political candidates, ballot campaigns, advocacy organizations and media outlets. Through this work, she developed research and communications expertise on issues of particular concern to women. Shabo's earlier professional experience includes a stint with the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee.

Shabo graduated summa cum laude with a Bachelor of Arts in politics and American studies from Pomona College, and holds a Master of Arts in political science from the University of Michigan. She earned her law degree with high honors from the University of North Carolina, where she served as editor in chief of the North Carolina Law Review. After law school, she clerked for the Honorable Michael R. Murphy on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in Salt Lake City.