Blog

New Resource: Repro Health Watch Highlights War on Women’s Health in the States

| May 21, 2012

(Read time: )

Facts matter. When the facts about women’s health are a central part of the discussion about access to reproductive health care, the conversation changes – and now more than ever, we need that change.

In the past year, women’s health has faced attack after attack – and not just from Congress. According to the Guttmacher Institute, 135 new provisions restricting reproductive health and rights, 92 of which restricted access to abortion care, were instituted across 36 states in 2011. And already this year, state legislators have introduced 944 provisions related to reproductive health and rights, half of which would restrict abortion. It’s becoming increasingly clear that the “war on women” is nowhere near over.

With that in mind, the National Partnership for Women & Families is pleased to announce a new feature of our respected Women’s Health Policy Report – Repro Health Watch. This new resource will highlight media coverage of attacks on women’s reproductive health care in each state, identify policy trends happening across state lines, and offer additional resources, including updates on litigation challenging restrictive new anti-choice and anti-birth control laws.

The website, www.ReproHealthWatch.org, features media coverage of developments in reproductive health policy in all 50 states and the District of Columbia, organized by state and by issue. In addition, readers may subscribe to email updates that link to articles, blogs and video coverage about these restrictions.

Repro Health Watch covers key issue areas such as:

Abortion: abortion bans; restrictions on insurance coverage for abortion services; TRAP laws (Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers); and laws that directly interfere with the relationship between women and their doctors by interfering with a woman’s medical care through waiting periods, mandatory counseling, parental involvement laws or unnecessary medical procedures, such as mandatory ultrasounds.

Personhood initiatives: legislative and ballot attempts to redefine life that would criminalize not just abortion but also some forms of contraception and reproductive technologies.

Refusal provisions: laws that allow health providers to refuse to provide certain medical services, such as abortion and contraception, based on their moral or religious beliefs.

Family planning: access to contraception; attacks on Planned Parenthood; attacks on funding for family planning services; and restrictions that bar family planning funds from going to clinics that are affiliated with clinics that offer abortion services.

Comprehensive sex education: developments on state budgets and legislation that determines whether teens have access to comprehensive sex education, as opposed to abstinence only education.

The courts have been a critical safeguard against some encroachments on women’s rights and health. Thus, Repro Health Watch also includes “In the Courts,” a section where readers can find basic information on how anti-choice laws are being challenged in the courts and links to more information.

We want to hear from you! Repro Health Watch is meant to be a resource for you, so take a look – and if you have any thoughts or comments, please contact us at reprohealthwatch@nationalpartnership.org.

About the Author

Andrea Friedman

Andrea Friedman

Andrea D. Friedman is the senior policy advisor for reproductive health programs at the National Partnership for Women & Families.

Friedman oversees the National Partnership’s reproductive health strategy and advocacy work. Prior to joining the organization, she served as counsel and legislative assistant to Senator Frank R. Lautenberg (D – N.J.) covering foreign affairs, defense, homeland security, veterans affairs and trade. Friedman staffed Senator Lautenberg on the State and Foreign Operations Appropriations Subcommittee, where he successfully introduced amendments in committee to permanently repeal the Global Gag Rule (also known as the Mexico City Policy), and secured exceptions to the Peace Corps’ abortion ban in the committee-approved bill. She also successfully advocated to secure the provision of emergency contraception by USAID health programs.

Friedman has worked as an international human rights lawyer with a focus on women's rights and peace and security. She was founding vice president of the Global Justice Center, a New York-based international human rights organization that works with leaders in countries in transition to embed international legal guarantees for gender equality. Before that, she was program manager at the Women and Public Policy Program at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government.

A term member of the Council on Foreign Relations, Friedman has been published numerous times and been a regular presenter on gender issues, women, peace and security, and international law, leading trainings around the world, including in Thailand, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Senegal and Jordan.

Friedman received her Bachelor of Arts in political science summa cum laude from Tufts University, where she delivered the commencement address, and her Juris Doctor from Harvard Law School, where she was a founder and the first president of the Harvard Chapter of Law Students for Reproductive Justice.