Blog

Election 2012: Hope for Workers and Families

| Nov 8, 2012

(Read time: )

For those who advocate day in and day out for family friendly policies, this election brings hope. Not the more na ve and dreamy hope of 2008, but a hope borne out of the reality of the last four years and a growing recognition of the real demographic changes in our society. Hope that springs from the demonstrated desire of people in the United States to have government policies that help workers and families succeed in joining and staying in the middle class.

Hope also springs from a growing consensus that leaders must work together to find common sense solutions to working families’ struggles. New York Times columnist David Brooks nailed it the day after the election: “If you look at the polls, and I’ve been looking all day at Asian-Americans and Latinos, how they look at America, they believe ferociously in work. And they think some government programs help them work harder.” Brooks goes on to say that the central question for leaders to face is: “How do we help people work harder and make their lives better?” (Read more here.)

Family friendly policies fit the bill. Workers who earn paid sick days can work more productively and in healthier workplaces because they don’t have to work sick, and they can work with greater economic security because they don’t have to worry about losing income or risking their jobs when a child comes down with the flu. Workers who can take paid family leave after the birth of a child are more likely to return to work, to be more attached to their employers, to earn higher wages over time and to rely less on public assistance. And workers who have flexibility and control over their schedules need not worry that their jobs are on the line when family responsibilities arise. All of these common sense, pro-work policies fall into the bucket of government standards that would help people work harder and smarter.

For the public, family friendly policies unite rather than divide. Most Republicans, Independents and Democrats support common sense standards. Three-quarters of adults in the United States support a national paid sick days law so that workers don’t have to risk losing their jobs or wages because they or a child are sick, and a similar share believe that family and maternity leave are very important workplace standards. Voters who have had the opportunity to hear a fulsome debate about a paid sick days standard overwhelmingly believe that elected officials who support paid sick days policies are standing up for working people and understand their real-life challenges. On all of these questions, support holds firm across partisan divides.

As we move forward, let us answer the question “How do we help people work harder and make their lives better?” by looking to the obvious: paid sick days, paid leave and greater efforts to make workplaces more family friendly. Together, we will forge that path forward.

About the Author

Vicki Shabo

Vicki Shabo

Vicki Shabo is vice president at the National Partnership for Women & Families and is one of the nation's leading experts on paid family and medical leave, paid sick days and the workplace policy advocacy landscape. She previously served for more than four years as the organization's director of work and family programs. Shabo is responsible for the strategic direction of the National Partnership’s work to promote fair and family friendly workplaces and leads the organization’s work on paid family and medical leave, paid sick days, expansion and enforcement of the Family and Medical Leave Act, workplace flexibility, fair pay and pregnancy discrimination. She serves as a contact on workplace policy issues for key national allies, researchers, businesses and state and local advocates and has been quoted in the New York Times, Washington Post, Associated Press, USA Today, CNN and MSNBC, among other outlets.

Shabo brings a unique background in law and politics to her work: Prior to joining the National Partnership in 2010, she practiced law in the litigation department at WilmerHale, a large international law firm. Before embarking on a legal career, she worked with both Celinda Lake and Harrison Hickman, serving as a pollster and political strategist to political candidates, ballot campaigns, advocacy organizations and media outlets. Through this work, she developed research and communications expertise on issues of particular concern to women. Shabo's earlier professional experience includes a stint with the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee.

Shabo graduated summa cum laude with a Bachelor of Arts in politics and American studies from Pomona College, and holds a Master of Arts in political science from the University of Michigan. She earned her law degree with high honors from the University of North Carolina, where she served as editor in chief of the North Carolina Law Review. After law school, she clerked for the Honorable Michael R. Murphy on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in Salt Lake City.