Blog

Women Deserve the Truth

| Mar 20, 2018

(Read time: )

The case the U.S. Supreme Court is hearing today is about whether California can require anti-abortion fake clinics to disclose the fact that they aren’t licensed and to give women information about the free and low-cost services, including contraception, prenatal care and abortion care, that are available to them. It’s about whether states that protect consumers by regulating nail salons and auto repair shops can also protect patients from fraud and deception. It’s about the simple proposition that women deserve the truth. It’s about honesty and integrity. National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA) v. Becerra should be a no-brainer for the Court.

The fake women’s health centers at issue in this case masquerade as comprehensive health care clinics. They prey on women facing unintended pregnancies and often target young women, women of color and low-income women. The tactics they use are truly despicable. Imagine you’ve just found out that you are pregnant. You want sound advice and real health care. You search online and find a clinic but realize, only after you get there, that you’ve been deceived – that the staff are trying to shame you and scare you away from choosing abortion.

Rather than being approached as a person with value whose future is important, who can make her own decisions, who should be treated with dignity and respect – you’re manipulated to meet someone else’s ends.

Too many women don’t have to imagine it. It happens every day to real women all across the country.

States like California should be applauded for protecting the women who fake centers trick and harm.

These fake centers deceive women. The deception starts with ads that imply they offer comprehensive reproductive health services. They are designed to lure women away from real clinics that would actually meet their needs.

These fake centers mislead women. They regularly peddle lies that have been repeatedly discredited by the country’s most prominent medical experts, such as false links between abortion and breast cancer, and lies about women’s feelings after an abortion.

These fake centers shame women. Staff use emotional manipulation. They may pray for the woman and fetus or ask for an invitation to the baby shower while administering an ultrasound. It’s cruel.

And they delay care. The often-untrained people who administer ultrasounds sometimes lie about how far along a woman’s pregnancy is, potentially causing her to miss a state cutoff for abortion care or delaying important prenatal care.

Deceiving women, misleading women, shaming women, delaying care for women – it has to stop.

We would not allow it in any other area of health care, and we cannot allow it here.

Women deserve unbiased information about all their options. Women have the right to transparent, truthful health information. It’s time to end the lies.

The Supreme Court must rule in favor of California, to protect the integrity of our health care system and women’s dignity and health.

About the Author

Sarah Lipton-Lubet

Sarah Lipton-Lubet

Sarah Lipton-Lubet is a vice president at the National Partnership for Women & Families where she leads the organization’s policy and advocacy efforts to advance reproductive health and rights. Lipton-Lubet joined the National Partnership in 2014 as the director of reproductive health programs. She has extensive experience in reproductive rights advocacy, having served in key roles at the American Civil Liberties Union, Center for Reproductive Rights and Religious Action Center for Reform Judaism.

Lipton-Lubet is the author of numerous op-eds, blogs, reports, and academic articles on women’s health and rights. Her policy observations and analyses have been heard on NPR and quoted in a number of media outlets including the New York Times, Washington Post and Associated Press.

Lipton-Lubet graduated summa cum laude from Northwestern University with a Bachelor of Arts in American studies. She earned her law degree from Yale Law School, where she was symposium and online editor for the Yale Law Journal, and submissions editor for the Yale Journal of Law and Feminism. After law school, Lipton-Lubet clerked for the Honorable Nancy Gertner of the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts and the Honorable Richard Paez of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. She currently serves on the Yale Law School Association Executive Committee.