Blog

New Data and Stories Make the Case for a National Paid Sick Days Standard

| Jul 29, 2015

(Read time: )

All workers should be able to take paid sick time when they get the flu or need medical care, or when a child has a fever and needs to see a doctor. And yet a new series of fact sheets released today by the National Partnership puts into stark relief just how much access to paid sick days in this country still depends on where you live and the job you hold. It’s outrageous, and it means that millions of families face financial hardship and even job loss when illness strikes. That has real consequences for the health and well-being of our communities and economy.

Twenty-four jurisdictions across the country now have, or will soon have, laws that guarantee workers the right to earn paid sick time. But, as we learned just last week, even though there has been some progress due to new laws and worker organizing, more than 43 million private sector workers still cannot earn paid sick days. That’s nearly 40 percent of the workforce – a number that has remained largely unchanged in recent years, despite the well-documented benefits of paid sick days and the fact that 85 percent of voters say they want employers to provide them.

Our new fact sheets focus on the individuals and industries most affected by the nation’s lack of a paid sick days standard, including children, restaurant workers and low-wage workers and their families. For the 41 states that do not yet have a state or municipal law, we paired state data released in May 2015 by the Institute for Women’s Policy Research and the National Partnership with the most recent data on the size of the populations most likely affected by the lack of paid sick days. For the District of Columbia and nine states that have a state or municipal paid sick days law, we summarized those laws and data on their effectiveness.

Taken together, the fact sheets make a powerful case for paid sick days standards. In Colorado, more than 816,000 private sector workers cannot earn a single paid sick day. There are more than 660,000 restaurant workers in Florida, an industry in which 90 percent of workers nationally do not have paid sick days. Nearly 1.5 million Michigan children live in families in which all parents work, but often parents who do have paid sick days cannot use them to care for a child. And nearly 22 percent of jobs in Vermont are low wage and, therefore, unlikely to offer paid sick time.

These states are not special cases, and these numbers represent the struggles of real people. People like Jessica, an Illinois restaurant worker who says she has often worked sick because she couldn’t afford to take unpaid time off. People like Jennifer, a single mother in Texas who has to leave her son, who has chronic health issues, home alone when he gets sick because she can’t use paid sick time. And millions of other women and men, mothers and fathers, and children and caregivers who know firsthand what it is like to choose between your health or the health of your family and a job.

Stories like these and state and national level data make it painfully clear that employers and lawmakers are not acting quickly enough to establish the paid sick days standards workers and families across the country urgently want and need. Lawmakers at all levels, and especially in Congress, need to look closely at what is at stake for the country’s working families and its economy, and take action. The Healthy Families Act, which would establish a national paid sick days standard, is long overdue. It is past time for Congress to make it a high priority.

About the Author

Vicki Shabo

Vicki Shabo

Vicki Shabo is vice president at the National Partnership for Women & Families and is one of the nation's leading experts on paid family and medical leave, paid sick days and the workplace policy advocacy landscape. She previously served for more than four years as the organization's director of work and family programs. Shabo is responsible for the strategic direction of the National Partnership’s work to promote fair and family friendly workplaces and leads the organization’s work on paid family and medical leave, paid sick days, expansion and enforcement of the Family and Medical Leave Act, workplace flexibility, fair pay and pregnancy discrimination. She serves as a contact on workplace policy issues for key national allies, researchers, businesses and state and local advocates and has been quoted in the New York Times, Washington Post, Associated Press, USA Today, CNN and MSNBC, among other outlets.

Shabo brings a unique background in law and politics to her work: Prior to joining the National Partnership in 2010, she practiced law in the litigation department at WilmerHale, a large international law firm. Before embarking on a legal career, she worked with both Celinda Lake and Harrison Hickman, serving as a pollster and political strategist to political candidates, ballot campaigns, advocacy organizations and media outlets. Through this work, she developed research and communications expertise on issues of particular concern to women. Shabo's earlier professional experience includes a stint with the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee.

Shabo graduated summa cum laude with a Bachelor of Arts in politics and American studies from Pomona College, and holds a Master of Arts in political science from the University of Michigan. She earned her law degree with high honors from the University of North Carolina, where she served as editor in chief of the North Carolina Law Review. After law school, she clerked for the Honorable Michael R. Murphy on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in Salt Lake City.